Art on the Seventh Sunday after Pentecost, Proper 9B

So all the elders of Israel came to the king at Hebron; and King David made a covenant with them at Hebron before the LORD, and they anointed David king over Israel. 2 Samuel 5:3

David Crowned King of Israel, wood engraving, c.1860, Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld, 1794-1872

Reading: 2 Samuel 5:1-5, 9-10

Commentary by Hovak Najarian
 

After David was crowned King of Judah and reigned for seven years, all of the tribes of Israel met with him and said, “We are your own flesh and blood.  In the past, while Saul was king over us, you were the one who led Israel on their military campaigns.  And the Lord said to you, ‘You will shepherd my people Israel, and you will become their ruler’” David then “made a covenant with them at Hebron before the Lord, and they anointed David king over Israel.”


 Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld’s engraving, David Crowned King of Israel depicts an elder pouring oil on David’s head while another is kneeling and holding a crown.  David leans forward slightly as he is being anointed.  He is looking at the crown and his hands are open as though he is acknowledging and accepting the confidence that is being placed in him.


Carolsfeld presents the moment of crowning as a tableau with David at the center.  Almost all attention of the participants on stage is directed toward him.  After we glance at the overall composition of this engraving, we tend to go back and enter the scene from the left.  From there, the woman at the far left guides us visually to the place above David’s head where oil is being poured.  Her gaze is fixed on the procedure.  In life, when we see a person’s eyes fixed in a particular direction, our tendency is to look to see what has engaged their attention.  This impulse is carried over as we look at subject matter in art.  In Carolsfeld’s engraving, almost everyone participating in the ceremony is focused on the anointment.


When we look at shapes, associations come to mind and we project meaning onto them (not always on a conscious level).  A pyramid or triangular shape with its broad base gives us a sense of stability, of being secure and on solid ground.  Von Carolsfeld has staged the scene of David’s crowning on a stepped-pyramid base, and the central figures move upward from there to continue a triangular grouping with the apex at the point where oil is being poured.  Secondary figures witnessing the crowning are on the sides and behind them in the background.  Their facial expressions seem filled with emotion and awe.  Above them is a drapery, the eighteenth century all-purpose filler of pictorial space and the “go to” backdrop of drama.  The clothes of the participants provide an abundance of opportunities for von Carolsfeld, to display his technical skills in the creation of light and shadow effects. 


Illustrations enhanced the text of handmade books during medieval times and after printing became mechanized at mid-fifteenth century, they added enrichment to texts through engravings.  As the work of artists continued to become specialized, those who created pictures for books became known as illustrators.  The art of illustrators was not regarded to be as important as that of painters, but engravers filled a need and they were assured steady work.

German artist von Carolsfeld lived in Italy for ten years and while there he became an admirer of High Renaissance painting.  Upon his return to Germany, he had a very successful career as a painter but also produced work in other media.  David Crowned King of Israel is one of over two hundred wood engravings created by von Carolsfeld for a Picture Bible

Hovak Najarian © 2018

Art & Music

More about the lithograph process:
Osmar Schindler’s image of David and Goliath is a lithograph [litho: stone, graph: drawing (drawing on stone)].  The process is based on oil and water not mixing.  When making a lithograph, a drawing is made with a greasy crayon on a flattened smooth-surfaced limestone.  The surface is treated with a weak acid solution which rolls off the  crayon drawing and covers the unmarked areas of the stone.   After the drawing is removed with a solvent, the surface is made wet.  Water clings to the treated surface but not to where the drawing was made (and removed).  When the stone is inked with a large roller, the ink is rejected by the watered surface and clings only to where there was once a drawing.  Paper is placed over the inked stone and it is run through a press.  When the paper is pulled off the stone, the image (once a drawing on the stone) is now on the paper (in reverse).  Multiple prints may be made by this process.  If color is to be used, a separate stone is used for each color.  Artists may color a lithograph by hand after it has been printed. ~Hovak Najarian

For more art and art commentary search the Art & Music Category or use Hovak Najarian as your search term.

Image

    Wikimedia Commons

    See also “julius schnorr von carolsfeld bible illustrations” (Google search)

    Uncovering ancient imagery in 21st century English

    The Lord is my shepherd

    Psalm 23:1

    “The Lord is my shepherd.” This line from Psalm 23 is among the most famous images from the Bible. But as I describe in And God Said, for most people the English words hide the ancient imagery.

    So begins Joel M. Hoffman in his post, The Lord isn’t the Shepherd You Think (or: Don’t Mess with the Shepherds) on his blog God Didn’t Say That.

    Hoffman, in imagining a 21st century “shepherd,” tells us he would cast Woody Allen to play the role in his imaginary movie. But he doesn’t let us stop there.

    So even though the Hebrew in Psalm 23 is ro’eh, and even though ro’eh literally means “shepherd,” I don’t think “The Lord is my shepherd” is a very good translation.

    He points us to the qualities of “shepherd” in the Hebrew Bible. Shepherds…

    … have a surprising and surpassing ferocity about them

    We see … in Jeremiah 49:19, where God is “like a lion” that can’t be stopped. Using increasingly powerful imagery, the text has God ask, “Who is like me? Who can summon me? Who is the shepherd who can stand before me?” (NRSV). In other words, God is so powerful that even a shepherd will be beaten back. In modern terms, again, the imagery is nonsensical. But in the Bible, shepherds were symbols of strength.

    … are similar to royalty and nobility

    King David was a shepherd. … in Micah 5:5, … shepherds are in parallel with rulers, a literary device that, in the Bible, suggests that they were similar. And in Nahum 3:18 we find shepherds in parallel with nobles.

    … have “sex-appeal”

    Finally, shepherds were symbols of romance. Song of Solomon, the most overtly sexual book of the Bible, is filled with images of shepherds. … The famous imagery in verse 2:16, “my lover is mine and I am his,” ends with two Hebrew words to describe the heroine’s lover. They translate as, “[the one] who is a shepherd among flowers.”

    After this expansion of our wimpy 21st century understanding of “shepherd” Hoffman summarizes: “In short, for the ancient image of a shepherd, think John Wayne, not Woody Allen.”

    I encourage you to read The Lord isn’t the Shepherd You Think. You may hear Psalm 23 with new ears, new hope, and new delight.

    If you’re in the desert on 4/21/13 come join us in the Sunday Morning Forum at St. Margaret’s at 9:00 am. If not, let me/us know what you think about Joel’s post and linguistic analysis; leave a comment.

    What’s in a name?

    Though we use names and titles differently in 2011 CE than in 111 CE they affect us: our emotional state, our responsiveness to the person being introduced or spoken to, and our general “feeling” about the person being addressed, spoken about, or spoken to. This was the thinking behind the Sunday Forum on 15 May 2011.

    For you were going astray like sheep, but now you have returned to the shepherd and guardian of your souls.  1 Peter 2:25

    Taking that single verse at the end of the Lesson from 1 Peter we spoke out our “names and titles” of Jesus to one another. It was a lively discussion. Please leave a comment here to any or all of the questions we considered on Sunday. At minimum, answer the questions for yourself.

    Sunday’s Questions

    • How many names/titles do you use when speaking of Jesus?
    • How many names/titles do you use for addressing Jesus in prayer?
    • Which name do you use most frequently?
    • Have you ever thought about this?
    • Does it make any difference?

    These are just a few of the questions that can be asked based upon a single line, verse 25, in today’s lesson from the First Letter of Peter. To highlight once again the dilemma faced by contemporary translators I offer several translations of  the Greek word episkopos used long ago. Try out each translation as a prayer word; each word evokes a different emotion for me. How about you?

    King James Version KJV
    For ye were as sheep going astray ; but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls.

    New Revised Standard Version NRSV
    For you were going astray like sheep, but now you have returned to the shepherd and guardian of your souls.

    New International Version NIV
    For you were like sheep going astray, but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls.

    New American Bible Revised Edition NABRE
    For you had gone astray like sheep, but you have now returned to the shepherd and guardian of your souls.

    Contemporary English Version CEV
    You had wandered away like sheep. Now you have returned to the one who is your shepherd and protector.